This is Part 2 of my series on the evolution of SaaS. If you haven’t read Part 1: The SaaS Model Isn’t Dead, it’s Evolving Beyond the Hype of “Vibe Coding”, start there for the full context. In this post, I’m diving deeper into the hidden costs that most builders don’t see until it’s too late.
In my last post, I argued that SaaS isn’t dead, it’s just evolving beyond the surface-level appeal of vibe coding. Today, I want to dig deeper into something most builders don’t realize until it’s too late: the hidden costs of “free” AI-powered alternatives.
Because here’s the uncomfortable truth: when you replace a $99/month SaaS tool with a Frankenstein stack of AI prompts, no-code platforms, and API glue, you’re not saving money. You’re just moving the costs somewhere else, usually to places you can’t see until they bite you.
Let’s talk about what really happens when you choose the “cheaper” path.
The Time Tax: When Free Becomes Expensive
Picture this: you’ve built your “MVP” in a weekend. It’s glorious. ChatGPT wrote half the code, Zapier connects your Airtable to your Stripe account, and a Make.com scenario handles email notifications. Total monthly cost? Maybe $20 in API fees.
You’re feeling like a genius.
Then Monday morning hits. A customer reports an error. The Zapier workflow failed silently. You spend two hours digging through logs (when you can find them) only to discover that Airtable changed their API rate limits, and now your automation hits them during peak hours.
You patch it with a delay. Problem solved.
Until Wednesday, when three more edge cases emerge. The Python script you copied from ChatGPT doesn’t handle timezone conversions properly. Your payment flow breaks for international customers. The no-code platform you’re using doesn’t support the webhook format you need.
Each fix takes 30 minutes to 3 hours.
By Friday, you’ve spent more time maintaining your “free” stack than you would have spent just using Stripe Billing and ConvertKit.
This is the time tax. And unlike your SaaS subscription, you can’t expense it or write it off. It’s just gone, stolen from building features, talking to customers, or actually running your business.
The question isn’t whether your DIY solution costs less. It’s whether your time is worth $3/hour.
The Knowledge Debt: Building on Borrowed Understanding
Here’s a scenario that plays out constantly in the AI-first era:
A developer prompts Claude to build a payment integration. The AI generates beautiful code, type-safe, well-structured, handles edge cases. The developer copies it, tests it once, and ships it.
It works perfectly for two months.
Then Stripe deprecates an API endpoint. Or a customer discovers a refund edge case. Or the business wants to add subscription tiers.
Now what?
The developer stares at 200 lines of code they didn’t write and don’t fully understand. They can prompt the AI again, but they don’t know which parts are safe to modify. They don’t know why certain patterns were used. They don’t know what will break.
This is knowledge debt, the accumulated cost of using code you haven’t internalized.
Compare this to using a proper SaaS tool like Stripe Billing or Chargebee. You don’t understand every line of their code either, but you don’t need to. They handle the complexity. They migrate your data when APIs change. They’ve already solved the edge cases.
When you build with barely-understood AI-generated code, you get the worst of both worlds: you’re responsible for maintenance without having the knowledge to maintain it effectively.
This isn’t a knock on AI tools. It’s a reality check about technical debt in disguise.
The Reliability Gap: When “Good Enough” Isn’t
Let’s zoom out and talk about production-grade systems.
When you use Slack, it has 99.99% uptime. That’s not luck, it’s the result of on-call engineers, redundant infrastructure, automated failovers, and millions of dollars in operational excellence.
When you stitch together your own “Slack alternative” using Discord webhooks, Airtable, and a Telegram bot, what’s your uptime?
You don’t even know, because you’re not measuring it.
And here’s the thing: your customers notice.
They notice when notifications arrive 3 hours late because your Zapier task got queued during peak hours. They notice when your checkout flow breaks because you hit your free-tier API limits. They notice when that one Python script running on Replit randomly stops working.
Reliability isn’t a feature you can bolt on later. It’s the foundation everything else is built on.
This is why companies still pay for Datadog instead of writing their own monitoring. Why they use PagerDuty instead of email alerts. Why they choose AWS over running servers in their garage.
Not because they can’t build these things themselves, but because reliability at scale requires obsessive attention to details that don’t show up in MVP prototypes.
Your vibe-coded solution might work 95% of the time. But that missing 5% is where trust dies and customers churn.
The Support Nightmare: Who Do You Call?
Imagine this email from a customer:
“Hi, I tried to upgrade my account but got an error. Can you help?”
Simple enough, right?
Except your “upgrade flow” involves:
- A Stripe Checkout session (managed by Stripe)
- A webhook that triggers Make.com (managed by Make.com)
- Which updates Airtable (managed by Airtable)
- Which triggers a Zapier workflow (managed by Zapier)
- Which sends data to your custom API (deployed on Railway)
- Which updates your database (hosted on PlanetScale)
One of these broke. Which one? You have no idea.
You start debugging:
- Check Stripe logs. Payment succeeded.
- Check Make.com execution logs. Ran successfully.
- Check Airtable. Record updated.
- Check Zapier. Task queued but not processed yet.
Ah. Zapier’s free tier queues tasks during high-traffic periods. The upgrade won’t process for another 15 minutes.
You explain this to the customer. They’re confused and frustrated. So are you.
Now imagine that same scenario with a proper SaaS tool like Memberstack or MemberSpace. The customer emails them. They check their logs, identify the issue, and fix it. Done.
When you own the entire stack, you own all the problems too. And most founders don’t realize how much time “customer support for your custom infrastructure” actually takes until they’re drowning in it.
The Security Illusion: Compliance Costs You Can’t See
Pop quiz: Is your AI-generated authentication system GDPR compliant?
Does it properly hash passwords? Does it prevent timing attacks? Does it implement proper session management? Does it handle token refresh securely? Does it log security events appropriately?
If you’re not sure, you’ve got a problem.
Because when you use Auth0, Clerk, or AWS Cognito, these questions are answered for you. They have security teams, penetration testers, and compliance certifications. They handle GDPR, CCPA, SOC2, and whatever acronym-soup regulation applies to your industry.
When you roll your own auth with AI-generated code, you own all of that responsibility.
And here’s what most people don’t realize: security incidents are expensive. Not just in terms of fines and legal costs, but in reputation damage and customer trust.
One breach can kill a startup. And saying “but ChatGPT wrote the code” isn’t a legal defense.
The same logic applies to payment handling, data storage, and API security. Every shortcut you take multiplies your risk surface.
SaaS tools don’t just sell features, they sell peace of mind. They carry the liability so you don’t have to.
The Scale Wall: When Growth Breaks Everything
Your vibe-coded MVP works perfectly for your first 10 customers. Then you get featured on Product Hunt.
Suddenly you have 500 new signups in 24 hours.
Your Airtable base hits record limits. Your free-tier API quotas are maxed out. Your Make.com scenarios are queuing tasks for hours. Your Railway instance keeps crashing because you didn’t configure autoscaling. Your webhook endpoints are timing out because they weren’t designed for concurrent requests.
Everything is on fire.
This is the scale wall, the moment when your clever shortcuts stop being clever and start being catastrophic.
Real SaaS products are built to scale. They handle traffic spikes. They have redundancy. They auto-scale infrastructure. They cache aggressively. They optimize database queries. They monitor performance.
Your vibe-coded stack probably does none of these things.
And here’s the brutal part: scaling isn’t something you can retrofit easily. It’s architectural. You can’t just “add more Zapier workflows” your way out of it.
At this point, you face a choice: either rebuild everything properly (which takes months and risks losing customers during the transition), or artificially limit your growth to stay within the constraints of your fragile infrastructure.
Neither option is appealing.
The Integration Trap: When Your Stack Doesn’t Play Nice
One of the biggest promises of the AI-powered, no-code revolution is that everything integrates with everything.
Except it doesn’t. Not really.
Sure, Zapier connects to 5,000+ apps. But those integrations are surface-level. You get basic CRUD operations, not deep functionality.
Want to implement complex business logic? Want custom error handling? Want to batch process data efficiently? Want real-time updates instead of 15-minute polling?
Suddenly you’re writing custom code anyway, except now you’re writing it in the weird constraints of whatever platform you’ve chosen, rather than in a proper application where you have full control.
The irony is thick: you chose no-code to avoid complexity, but you ended up with a different kind of complexity, one that’s harder to debug and impossible to version control properly.
Meanwhile, a well-designed SaaS tool either handles your use case natively or provides a proper API for custom integration. You’re not fighting the platform; you’re using it as intended.
The Real Cost Comparison
Let’s do some actual math.
Vibe-coded stack:
- Zapier Pro: $20/month
- Make.com: $15/month
- Airtable Pro: $20/month
- Railway: $10/month
- Various API costs: $15/month
- Total: $80/month
Your time:
- Initial setup: 20 hours
- Weekly maintenance: 3 hours
- Monthly debugging: 5 hours
- Customer support for stack issues: 2 hours
- Monthly time cost: ~20 hours
If your time is worth even $50/hour (a modest rate for a technical founder), that’s $1,000/month in opportunity cost.
Total real cost: $1,080/month.
Proper SaaS stack:
- Stripe Billing: Included with processing fees
- Memberstack: $25/month
- ConvertKit: $29/month
- Vercel: $20/month
- Total: $74/month + processing fees
Your time:
- Initial setup: 4 hours
- Weekly maintenance: 0.5 hours
- Monthly debugging: 1 hour
- Customer support for stack issues: 0 hours (vendor handles it)
- Monthly time cost: ~3 hours
At $50/hour, that’s $150/month in opportunity cost.
Total real cost: $224/month.
The “more expensive” SaaS stack actually costs 80% less when you account for time.
And we haven’t even factored in:
- The revenue lost from downtime
- The customers lost from poor reliability
- The scaling issues you’ll hit later
- The security risks you’re accepting
- The knowledge debt you’re accumulating
When DIY Makes Sense (And When It Doesn’t)
Look, I’m not saying you should never build anything custom. There are absolutely times when DIY is the right choice.
Build custom when:
- The functionality is core to your competitive advantage
- No existing tool solves your exact problem
- You have the expertise to maintain it long-term
- You’re building something genuinely novel
- You have the team capacity to own it forever
Use SaaS when:
- The functionality is commodity (auth, payments, email, etc.)
- Reliability and uptime are critical
- You want to focus on your core product
- You’re a small team with limited time
- You need compliance and security guarantees
- You value your time more than monthly fees
The pattern is simple: build what makes you unique, buy what makes you functional.
The AI-Assisted Middle Ground
Here’s where it gets interesting: AI doesn’t just enable vibe coding. It also enables smarter SaaS integration.
You can use Claude or ChatGPT to:
- Generate integration code for SaaS APIs faster
- Debug webhook issues more efficiently
- Build wrapper libraries around vendor SDKs
- Create custom workflows on top of stable platforms
This is the sweet spot: using AI to accelerate your work with reliable tools, rather than using AI to replace reliable tools entirely.
Think of it like this: AI is an incredible co-pilot. But you still need the plane to have wings.
The Evolution Continues
My argument isn’t that AI tools are bad or that vibe coding is wrong. It’s that we need to be honest about the tradeoffs.
The next generation of successful products won’t be built by people who reject AI, and they won’t be built by people who reject SaaS.
They’ll be built by people who understand when to use each.
People who can vibe-code a prototype in a weekend, then have the discipline to replace it with proper infrastructure before it scales. People who use AI to augment their capabilities, not replace their judgment.
The future isn’t “AI vs. SaaS.” It’s “AI-enhanced SaaS.”
Tools that are easier to integrate because AI helps you. APIs that are easier to understand because AI explains them. Systems that are easier to maintain because AI helps you debug.
But beneath all that AI magic, there’s still reliable infrastructure, accountable teams, and boring old uptime guarantees.
Because at the end of the day, customers don’t care about your tech stack. They care that your product works when they need it.
Build for the Long Game
If you’re building something that matters, something you want customers to depend on, something you want to grow into a real business, you need to think beyond the MVP phase.
You need to think about what happens when you hit 100 users. Then 1,000. Then 10,000.
Will your clever weekend hack still work? Or will you be spending all your time keeping the lights on instead of building new features?
The most successful founders I know aren’t the ones who move fastest. They’re the ones who move sustainably, who build foundations that can support growth without collapsing.
They use AI to move faster. They use SaaS to stay reliable. They understand that both are tools, not religions.
Final Thoughts: Respect the Craft
There’s a romance to the idea of building everything yourself. Of being the 10x developer who needs nothing but an AI assistant and pure willpower.
But romance doesn’t ship products. Discipline does.
The best software is invisible. It just works. And making something “just work”, consistently, reliably, at scale, is harder than anyone admits.
So use AI. Vibe-code your prototypes. Move fast and experiment.
But when it’s time to ship, when it’s time to serve real customers, when it’s time to build something that lasts, respect the craft.
Choose boring, reliable infrastructure. Pay for the SaaS tools that solve solved problems. Invest in quality over cleverness.
Because the goal isn’t to build the most innovative tech stack.
The goal is to build something customers love and trust.
And trust, as it turns out, is built on the boring stuff. The stuff that works when you’re not looking. The stuff that scales without breaking. The stuff someone else maintains at 3 AM so you don’t have to.
That’s what SaaS really sells.
And that’s why it’s not dead, it’s just getting started.
What’s your experience balancing custom-built solutions with SaaS tools? Have you hit the scale wall or the reliability gap? Share your stories in the comments. I’d love to hear what you’ve learned.
If you found this useful, follow me for more posts on building sustainable products in the age of AI, where we embrace new tools without forgetting old wisdom.